Research Reveals AI Doesn't Reduce Work - It Intensifies It
New academic research from the University of Michigan challenges the promise of AI workload reduction, finding that AI tools actually make employees work faster and take on broader responsibilities.

Research Reveals AI Doesn't Reduce Work - It Intensifies It
One of the central promises of artificial intelligence is that it will reduce workloads, freeing employees to focus on higher-value and more engaging tasks. But new research suggests this promise may be fundamentally flawed.
A study from the University of Michigan, highlighted in Harvard Business Review, finds that AI tools don't reduce work - they consistently intensify it. Employees working with AI assistance worked at a faster pace and took on a broader scope of responsibilities.
The Counterintuitive Finding
The research challenges a core assumption driving enterprise AI adoption: that automation will decrease workloads and allow workers to focus on strategic tasks. Instead, the study found that AI implementation led to:
- •Faster work pace: Employees were expected to accomplish more in less time
- •Expanded responsibilities: The scope of tasks increased, not decreased
- •No reduction in workload: The promised "freeing up" of time never materialized
This finding comes at a critical time. Companies worldwide are investing billions in AI tools with the expectation that they'll reduce operational costs through efficiency gains. If the opposite occurs - if AI actually increases the intensity of work - organizations may need to reconsider their implementation strategies.
What This Means for AI Adoption
The research suggests several implications for businesses considering AI tools:
1. Reassess ROI expectations: If productivity gains come from intensifying existing work rather than reducing it, the true value proposition changes
2. Focus on augmentation, not replacement: AI may be most effective as a tool that enhances human capabilities rather than one expected to reduce headcount
3. Monitor workload impacts: Organizations should track not just productivity metrics but also employee wellbeing and burnout indicators
The Broader Context
This research adds to growing questions about AI's impact on work. Earlier studies have raised concerns about AI affecting job quality, while industry leaders like Sam Altman have acknowledged that AI companies may need to accept lower margins as the technology matures.
As enterprises continue their AI deployments, the Michigan research serves as a reminder that technology adoption doesn't always produce expected outcomes - and sometimes the most powerful assumption (that AI will reduce work) needs to be challenged.
Sources:
Share this article
About NeuralStackly Team
Expert researcher and writer at NeuralStackly, dedicated to finding the best AI tools to boost productivity and business growth.
View all posts